For the proliferation of pseudo-art collection cultural relics market investment problem can not be avoided
Such as painting, according to the statistics, the Qi life around the clock in the drawing even if their number is not more than 30,000 total; and can see on the market today, "Qi," as much as much as 350,000 ! Rampant forgeries into a crisis of confidence that the auction industry. Hong Kong earlier this year, Sotheby's spring auction, the auction of its important - one of Qi's "Tiger" appeared it was just a question.
Art critics of the Mu Jianping Beijing that "Tiger" inscription on the calligraphy "stiff stiff," "describe traces of obvious," and draw the lines and "too soft, too weak," "There is no skill to speak of ink", strokes and Qi Whitehead's style is a big gap. Huang, Zhejiang University College of Humanities, Professor Ding believes that the whole painting is pen fundamental weakness, poor air, form does not the United States, no gesture echoes the state, "can not each of its quality standards at the words" and that "this painting is a generic standard of less than five percent of the suspected counterfeit works. " In this regard, Sotheby's Hong Kong side and involved the collection by this famous firm Robert Chang denied in the end, the site suffered doubt, "Tiger" is still sold for 32.02 million yuan.
However, a ripple, and the next spring and autumn on the big shot, "pretending to be" and "fake" sound is always heard, and even to 436.8 million yuan turnover of the "pillar Ming" can not escape the "pretending to be" in questioned. "Di Martin," sold, the Henan Province Mr. Wang, a collection of paintings for many years, will house collections of calligraphy and related audio-visual products, Huang Ting, and so on out to cf text data, and careful study of the "pillar Ming" public photos, that price "pillar Ming" is a fake. The Beijing Poly side, said the film made before in the country's top authority of the experts invited was identified "as my authentic."
Compared to the field of fake paintings, fake antiques on the market, fake porcelain is not uncommon. Not long ago, in Beijing Chaoyang District Court CNS auction site auction company its strong enforcement, because the company in 2008 sold the eight antique porcelain items were identified as modern imitations, court judgments Company, and to be refund claims, but always fails to perform the auction CNS decision. Liu said the case of the complainant, when the purchase of eight antique porcelain, CNS auction company gave its offer genuine certificate of authenticity, three of which are two cultural relics appraisal certificate signed experts in the industry, and stamped with the seal precisely because of the authentic identification of the book, so he believed and bought porcelain.
On the "Tiger" and "pillar Ming" these two heavyweight debate the authenticity of the auction, the conclusion is still uncompromising, complicated and confusing. If this argument is only ancient but also the academic debate now continues, then the CNS auction off antiques event reflects the market situation so that collectors are the real worry: when the collection, the auction market forgeries, fakes run rampant, when identification of experts and scholars can not fidelity, how anyone can trust?
